[gcs-pcs-list] big day in #code4lib

[Ed Summers]

On 3/6/06, Xiaoming Liu <liu_x at lanl.gov> wrote:
> With all those possibilities, I don't think you want to limit the
> capability of unAPI to some pre-defined profiles, such as private or
> public, or transparent. This is really a decision of unAPI server or
> service implementation. I may choose well-known URIs when I intend to have
> the world use my data; or I can choose any private URIs if I want two
> linux box talk to each other. Again, there are lots of nice discussions
> about URI beyond scope of unAPI.

Well said! Perhaps we're only having this discussion because the unAPI
spec uses such prolific use of the term URI. s/URI/identifier/ and we
may not even be talking about it :-)

//Ed