[gcs-pcs-list] (possible) issue: what to do for redirects?
Daniel Chudnov
daniel.chudnov at yale.edu
Sun Mar 5 16:01:04 EST 2006
Mike Rylander wrote, on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:46:36PM +0000:
> On 3/3/06, Daniel Chudnov <daniel.chudnov at yale.edu> wrote:
> > - Is it wrong for OPA to use a redirect here? i.e. would it be more
> > appropriate for OPA (as an unAPI service) to fetch the remote data
> > itself, and return *that* to the user directly, with the correct
> > content-type and a 200 code?
>
> It seems to me that this would put unduly heavy requirements on the
> unAPI server. If we're depending on HTTP response codes to figure out
> what's going on, we should depend on them to get us to the endpoint as
> well ... IMHO :)
Indeed. I can live with this as-is, then. Happily. :)
The only caveat being (though it's really a separate case) in other
OPA examples like the generic OAI-PMH proxy, the unAPI service (OPA)
should do the heavy lifting of liberating the record from the OAI-PMH
wrapper and returning just the plain record/object directly.
-Dan
--
Daniel Chudnov
Yale Center for Medical Informatics
(203) 737-5789
More information about the gcs-pcs-list
mailing list