[gcs-pcs-list] new issue: is 406 correct?

[Alf Eaton]

Daniel Chudnov wrote:
> As of yet we're at +2 on this, with no additional comments.  That so
> few have weighed in could be because nobody cares, or because it's a
> trivial change, or because it's complicated, or because people are busy
> doing work they get paid for...  I dunno.  
> 
> In the past we've typically gotten at least five votes within 24 hours,
> so I'm raising a special flag on this.  I'm hesitant to make a spec
> change without at least a +5-or-so tally.  If you haven't had a chance to
> review this, please take a moment to do so.  If you're indifferent, please
> say so.  Even +2 and 3 indifferents/abstensions is better than just +2. :)

+1

(I hadn't voted because I didn't disagree with the consensus so far).

alf.